Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:09

What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
FX’s ‘Alien: Earth’ Official Trailer Reveals a Predatory Twist - The Hollywood Reporter
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Have husbands and wives ever had a threesome with someone in real life? How did it happen?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The heaviest proton emitter: New type of atomic nucleus discovered - Phys.org
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Avalanche Signs Nelson - NHL.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Poll: Are You Happy with Your PS Plus Essential Games for June 2025? - Push Square
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
SEC clears Trump Media filing, opening door to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin buy - The Block
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
This Week In Space podcast: Episode 163 — The Trials of Starship - Space